Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA)
Free non-disclosure agreement PDF — mutual or unilateral NDA, DTSA 18 USC §1836, UTSA, state-by-state non-compete matrix, ESIGN/UETA e-signature.
Pick mutual or unilateral
Mutual NDA (both parties exchange confidential info — default for M&A, JV, biz-dev) or unilateral (only one party discloses — default for employee, contractor, investor deck).…
Enter parties, scope, term & governing law
Disclosing party, receiving party, defined Confidential Information scope, term (2-5 yr default for non-trade-secret info; perpetual for actual trade secrets per DTSA / UTSA), governing…
Sign with ESIGN + UETA + eIDAS, download
E-signature with FRE 902(13) audit trail (signer name, email, IP, timestamp, SHA-256 hash). ESIGN Act 15 USC §7001 + state UETA (49 states + DC) + EU eIDAS QES on Start under Art.…
Why choose iFillPDF
Mutual + unilateral NDA — both flavors built-in
Toggle mutual (both sides exchange — M&A, JV, biz-dev) or unilateral (one-way — employee, contractor, investor pitch). eForms ships 21 separate PDFs you have to pick from; LegalZoom $35 sells one template per request; Rocket…
DTSA 18 USC §1836 + UTSA trade-secret coverage
Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act 18 USC §1836 (DTSA, civil action since May 2016 with ex parte seizure under §1836(b)(2) — available in every US district court) layered with state UTSA (48 states except NY + NC which use…
DTSA §1833(b) whistleblower notice — mandatory
Every employee + contractor NDA MUST include the DTSA §1833(b)(3) immunity notice — failure forfeits punitive damages AND the §1836(b)(3)(D) attorney-fee shifting if you later sue for trade-secret misappropriation.…
State non-compete matrix — CA / IL / MA / WA / DC
Auto-flags the 5 outright non-compete bans (California Bus & Prof §16600, Oklahoma Okla Stat tit 15 §217 + §218, North Dakota NDCC §9-08-06, Minnesota Stat §181.988 effective July 2023, DC Code §32-581.…
NLRB McLaren Macomb 2023 confidentiality carve-out
McLaren Macomb Hospital 372 NLRB No. 58 (Feb 2023) struck broad severance-NDA confidentiality clauses as violating NLRA Section 7 protected concerted activity for non-supervisory private-sector employees.…
Better than eForms / LegalZoom / LawDepot / Rocket Lawyer
eForms: free 21 static PDFs, no DTSA §1833(b) notice, no state non-compete matrix, no e-sign. eSign: free PDF, no McLaren Macomb carve-out. LegalZoom: $35 per doc + $39.99/mo Legal Plan upsell. LawDepot: $33/mo lock.…
Generate a court-grade non-disclosure agreement in 3 minutes — mutual NDA (both parties exchange confidential info, default for M&A, joint ventures, biz-dev) or unilateral NDA (only one party discloses, default for employee, contractor and investor decks). Trade-secret definition auto-pulled from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA, adopted in 48 states — only NY and NC use common-law equivalents) and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act 18 USC §1836 (DTSA, federal civil action since 2016 with ex parte seizure under §1836(b)(2), available in every US district court). Restatement (Third) Unfair Competition §39 trade-secret factors layered in for the 2 non-UTSA states. State-specific clause matrix: California Civ Code §3426 (UTSA + Bus & Prof §16600 total non-compete ban, void per Edwards v. Arthur Andersen 44 Cal. 4th 937, 2008), New York GBL §11 + the BDO Seidman v. Hirshberg 14-mile / 18-month reasonableness test, Illinois 820 ILCS 90 Freedom to Work Act ($75K+ income floor for non-compete enforceability, 2022 amendment), Texas Bus & Com Code §15.50 reasonable-restraint test, Florida Stat. §542.335 with the 2-year presumption-of-reasonableness, Massachusetts MGL ch. 149 §24L garden-leave 50% pay requirement. FTC Non-Compete Rule 16 CFR §910.1 status auto-flagged (Rule vacated by Ryan LLC v. FTC, ND Tex Aug 2024, currently on appeal to the 5th Circuit — we surface the live procedural posture). Mandatory DTSA §1833(b) whistleblower notice auto-inserted in every employee + contractor NDA (failure to include forfeits punitive damages + attorney-fee shifting under §1836(b)(3)(D) — most templates on the SERP miss this). NLRB McLaren Macomb 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023) confidentiality carve-out for protected concerted activity auto-added on employee NDAs (Section 7 NLRA rights — non-supervisory employees in private sector). Duration: 2-5 year evergreen window for non-trade-secret confidential info (perpetual for actual trade secrets per UTSA §6 / DTSA §1836(d) 3-year statute of limitations). IP assignment under 17 USC §201(b) work-made-for-hire + §101 specially commissioned works carve-out auto-inserted for contractor flavor (vs employee default-employer-owns). Return of confidential information clause, residuals clause (knowledge retained in unaided memory), permitted disclosure compelled by subpoena / FOIA / SEC EDGAR, governing-law + severability + integration boilerplate, AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules opt-in (or JAMS, NY Sup Ct, Delaware Court of Chancery for Delaware-LLC parties). EU GDPR Art. 28 + Standard Contractual Clauses (Module 1 C-to-C) auto-bundled for any party with an EU touch — Schrems II + EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 supplementary-measures compliant. Remedies block: injunctive relief (TRO + preliminary injunction under FRCP Rule 65), liquidated damages clause (capped at reasonable forecast per Restatement (Second) Contracts §356 to avoid penalty-clause unenforceability), attorney fee-shifting per DTSA §1836(b)(3)(D), and pre-judgment interest. ESIGN Act 15 USC §7001 + state UETA (49 states + DC, NY uses ESRA NY State Tech Law §301 equivalent) + EU eIDAS QES Art. 25/26 with PAdES-LTV long-term validity (ETSI EN 319 142). Encrypted at Hetzner Falkenstein eu-central-1 under TADPF (EO 14086) + Schrems II shielding from Cloud Act 50 USC §3024 / FISA 702, AES-256-GCM at rest + TLS 1.3, SOC 2 Type II audited 2025, ISO 27001:2022, FRE 902(13) audit trail. No LegalZoom $35 per doc, no LawDepot $33/mo lock, no Rocket Lawyer $39.99/mo membership, no LegalTemplates $39, no eForms PDF-only static blanks.
Go further with lifetime access
E-signature proof log, business templates, no watermark. $8.99, one payment, for life — no subscription.
Frequently asked questions
Mutual vs unilateral NDA — which one do I need?+
Mutual NDA (also called bilateral or two-way) — both parties exchange confidential information. Default for M&A due diligence, joint ventures, strategic biz-dev partnerships, co-development deals. Both sides bind themselves to the same confidentiality, return-of-info and remedies obligations. Unilateral NDA (also called one-way) — only one party (the Disclosing Party) shares confidential info; the other (the Receiving Party) signs the obligations. Default for employee onboarding, independent contractor engagements, investor pitch decks, vendor due diligence, beta-tester programs. The legal weight is identical — what matters is mirror-image consideration (mutual NDAs satisfy consideration on both sides without additional payment; unilateral NDAs need either the receiving party to receive something of value, e.g. employment or a contract, or nominal consideration). Our toggle auto-renumbers sections, swaps singular vs plural defined terms, and adds the DTSA §1833(b) whistleblower notice on any employee or contractor flavor.
What is the DTSA whistleblower notice and why does every NDA need it?+
The Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) at 18 USC §1833(b) created federal whistleblower immunity for any individual who discloses a trade secret to a federal, state or local government official OR to an attorney solely for the purpose of reporting or investigating a suspected violation of law. Critically, §1833(b)(3) requires every employer to provide notice of this immunity in any contract or agreement with an employee or contractor that governs the use of confidential information OR a trade secret. Failure to provide the notice forfeits both punitive damages (capped at 2x compensatory under §1836(b)(3)(C)) AND attorney-fee shifting under §1836(b)(3)(D) if the employer later sues for trade-secret misappropriation. The notice must be in the agreement itself OR cross-referenced to a policy document delivered to the employee. iFillPDF auto-inserts the statutory language in every employee + contractor NDA — most free templates on the SERP (eForms PDFs, eSign PDFs, NYU Stern static, UK National Archives template) silently skip this and kill the employer recovery rights.
Can I make an NDA for free?+
Yes — iFillPDF generates the full mutual or unilateral NDA PDF for free (unlimited free use with a watermark and 0 AI Deep Detect, no credit card, no email-wall on the free tier). Both eForms and eSign also publish free static PDF blanks but they ship as fill-in-the-blank Adobe forms with no clause engine, no DTSA §1833(b) notice, no state non-compete matrix, no e-signature, and no McLaren Macomb 2023 NLRB carve-out for employee NDAs. Jotform offers an online NDA generator but charges $34/mo Bronze after 5 forms. LegalTemplates is $39 per doc. LawDepot is $33/mo lock. Rocket Lawyer is $39.99/mo membership. LegalZoom is $35 per single doc + $39.99/mo Legal Plan upsell. iFillPDF beyond the free tier is a one-time $8.99 Lifetime payment (no subscription) to remove the watermark for good + e-signature vault + eIDAS QES Art. 26 + AAA arbitration toggle + EU Frankfurt hosting + 7-year FRE 902(13) audit trail archive. AI Deep Detect is sold separately as one-time credit packs (10 for $10, 50 for $35, 200 for $80, never expire).
How long can an NDA last? Is a perpetual NDA enforceable?+
Two clocks. Clock #1 — for non-trade-secret confidential information (business plans, customer lists not rising to UTSA / DTSA trade-secret level, marketing strategies), US courts routinely enforce 2-5 year terms. Beyond 5 years for non-trade-secret info, courts (especially CA, NY, MA, IL) often strike the term as unreasonable restraint. Clock #2 — for actual trade secrets (UTSA §1(4) / DTSA 18 USC §1839(3) — information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known AND is subject to reasonable secrecy measures), the duty of confidentiality is perpetual — it lasts as long as the information meets the trade-secret definition. The DTSA statute of limitations is 3 years from discovery of misappropriation per §1836(d). UTSA SOL is also 3 years in most states (CA Civ Code §3426.6, NY common law uses 3 years from accrual). Our wizard auto-splits the duration clause into two tiers: a fixed term (2-5 yr default) for ordinary confidential info AND a perpetual term for trade secrets, which gives the disclosing party the strongest possible position without triggering reasonableness defects on the ordinary tier.
Are non-compete clauses in NDAs still enforceable after the FTC rule?+
It depends on your state, and as of May 2026 the federal landscape is in flux. The FTC Non-Compete Rule 16 CFR §910.1 (final April 2024, effective Sept 4 2024) banning most worker non-competes nationwide was VACATED by Ryan LLC v. FTC, No. 3:24-cv-00986 (ND Tex Aug 20 2024). The FTC appealed to the 5th Circuit; as of May 2026 the appeal is sub judice and the Rule is unenforceable nationwide. So enforcement reverts to state law, which varies sharply. Total bans: California Bus & Prof §16600 (void per Edwards v. Arthur Andersen 44 Cal. 4th 937, 2008), Oklahoma Okla Stat tit 15 §217-218, North Dakota NDCC §9-08-06, Minnesota Stat §181.988 (effective July 1 2023), DC Code §32-581.01 (effective Oct 1 2022). Income-floor states where non-competes are enforceable only above a salary threshold: Illinois 820 ILCS 90 ($75K), Washington RCW 49.62 ($116,594/yr 2024 cap, indexed), Massachusetts MGL ch 149 §24L (garden-leave 50% pay required), Oregon ORS §653.295 ($113,241/yr 2024). Reasonableness-test states (TX, FL, NY, NJ, PA, OH, GA, NC, VA, CO, etc.): time + geography + scope must be reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate business interest. We auto-flag the live state status — including the 5th Circuit appeal posture — when you pick the governing state.
Is an NDA legally binding without notarization?+
Yes. An NDA is a contract — it is legally binding on signature without notarization in all 50 states + DC. Notarization is NOT a formation requirement under any UTSA-adopting state or under the DTSA. What is required: mutual assent (offer + acceptance), consideration (each party gives something of value — mutual NDAs satisfy this on both sides by exchange; unilateral NDAs need either employment, payment, access to the disclosed info, or nominal consideration), capacity (over 18, mentally competent) and lawful purpose. Signature can be wet ink or electronic — ESIGN Act 15 USC §7001 + state UETA (49 states + DC) + EU eIDAS Art. 25 SES make e-signatures legally equivalent to handwritten in 99.9% of business contexts. Court admissibility is governed by FRE 902(13) self-authentication for electronic records with a hash + timestamp audit trail (which iFillPDF auto-generates: signer name, email, IP, timestamp, SHA-256 document hash, geo, device fingerprint). The one narrow exception: any NDA tied to a real-estate transaction worth over $5K that involves a deed of trust or mortgage may require notarization under state recording statutes — outside the scope of a standard biz-dev / employee / contractor NDA.
Does my NDA need an arbitration clause? AAA vs JAMS vs courts?+
Arbitration is optional but worth considering for cross-border deals or any NDA with damages above $250K exposure. Pros: faster than federal court (avg 12-18 months arbitration vs 24-36 months federal litigation per ADR Institute), confidential proceedings (key for trade-secret cases where public docket exposure defeats the secrecy element), enforceable globally under the New York Convention 1958 (170 signatory states) — much easier than enforcing a US federal court judgment in the EU, UK or Asia. Cons: limited appellate review (Federal Arbitration Act 9 USC §10 narrow grounds — corruption, fraud, evident partiality, exceeding powers), arbitrator fees ($500-$1,500/hr split between parties), no jury trial. Default arbitrators: American Arbitration Association (AAA) Commercial Arbitration Rules — most common, US-centric, $4,000 filing fee for claims under $1M; JAMS — premium tier ($2,000 filing fee, longer roster of retired federal judges, often preferred for complex IP); ICC International Court of Arbitration — gold standard for cross-border ($5,000 filing + percentage). For pure-US NDAs under $250K exposure, federal or state court (Delaware Court of Chancery for any Delaware-LLC party, NY Sup Ct Commercial Division for any NY party) is usually faster and cheaper than arbitration. Our toggle offers AAA, JAMS, ICC, or court — with the right boilerplate auto-generated.
Can I use an NDA across borders — US and EU?+
Yes — and you must add specific clauses to make it work. For any US-EU NDA, three pieces are mandatory. (1) GDPR data-processing addendum under Art. 28 if any personal data flows in either direction (employee NDAs, customer-list disclosures, beta-tester programs always trigger this). (2) Standard Contractual Clauses (SCC) Module 1 (controller-to-controller) for any data transfer from EU to US — the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (TADPF, Oct 2023 Adequacy Decision) currently covers US recipients self-certified to the framework, but Schrems II (CJEU C-311/18) still requires supplementary measures (encryption at rest with EU-held keys, no plain-text US-side processing, EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 §60-65). (3) Governing law + forum selection — courts split on whether to apply Rome I Regulation (EU choice) or US lex fori for the substantive obligations. Our cross-border toggle auto-bundles the SCC Module 1, Art. 28 DPA, EU representative designation (GDPR Art. 27) if the US party has no EU establishment, and the Brussels Recast Regulation (EU 1215/2012) Art. 25 jurisdiction clause. Hosting at Hetzner Falkenstein eu-central-1 (Germany) gives you native EU residency — beats DocuSign US (AWS us-east-1, Cloud Act 50 USC §3024 exposed), Adobe Sign US (AWS US), LegalZoom (AWS US), Rocket Lawyer (AWS US).
Free or paid?+
Free forever with a watermark and 0 AI Deep Detect, no page limit. No credit card, no signup wall on the free tier. To remove the watermark for good: a one-time $8.99 Lifetime payment (no subscription) for NDA generation + e-signature vault + EU eIDAS QES Art. 26 (Qualified Electronic Signature, the highest tier under eIDAS Regulation 910/2014 with PAdES-LTV long-term validity ETSI EN 319 142) + AAA / JAMS / ICC arbitration toggle + EU Frankfurt vault (TADPF + Schrems II shielded) + 7-year FRE 902(13) audit trail archive + state non-compete matrix updates pushed automatically (including the live 5th Circuit FTC Rule appeal posture). AI Deep Detect is sold as one-time credit packs (10 for $10, 50 for $35, 200 for $80, credits never expire). Compare 2026 US market: LegalZoom $35 per single NDA + $39.99/mo Legal Plan ($479.88/yr) for attorney review; Rocket Lawyer $39.99/mo membership ($479.88/yr) just to unlock the NDA + attorney; LawDepot $33/mo lock ($396/yr); LegalTemplates $39 per single doc with no e-sign; Bonsai $25/mo Lite (freelance-bundled but no DTSA §1833(b) audit); PandaDoc $19/mo Essentials (CRM-bundled, no state non-compete matrix); DocuSign $30/mo Personal (e-sign only, no clause engine); HelloSign / Dropbox Sign $20/mo (e-sign only); JotForm Bronze $34/mo (online generator after 5 forms); pdfFiller $10/mo Basic (PDF editor, no NDA clause logic); eForms free static PDF (no DTSA notice, no e-sign, no clause engine); eSign free static PDF (no McLaren Macomb 2023 carve-out, no clause engine).
More PDF tools
Keep going with a related tool — all free, no signup.